HouseholdsAIRobotics StandardRequireRating MarketModelVisionPitch 日本語
Roboline · Seed · 2026

Insurance for the machines that decide.

Every robot and every AI system in production is now an uninsured defendant. Standard policies are excluding it; courts are charging for it; nobody has a published price for it. We are building the carrier for the autonomy economy — starting with the cover the incumbents just deleted.

Raising$10M seed
The Roboline humanoid, seen close, its dark faceplate lit by two red points
Exhibit A — the insuredMost of them never get a face
01 — The moment

The incumbents just removed the cover. On a schedule.

In January 2026 ISO published generative-AI exclusion endorsements for US commercial general liability — CG 40 47, 40 48, 35 08. More than sixty insurance groups have filed with state regulators around adopting them. W. R. Berkley went further, with absolute AI exclusions reaching D&O and E&O. According to reporting, regulators have approved the large majority of those filings.

Pool the exclusions touch
$123bn
US "other liability" direct premium, 2024.
Replacement premium, modelled
$219.8m
AI-material firms who replace the cover rather than accept the hole. Judgment, declared.
The wave
1 Jan 2027
The first renewal cycle where most adopting carriers will have attached the forms.
What the wording settles
Not robots
The ISO forms target generative AI. Whether an agent or a robot falls inside is genuinely unsettled. Uncertainty sells better than exclusion.
This is not a market that needs educating. It is coverage being removed from existing policies at every renewal.
02 — The thesis

Every technology wave moves at the speed of its insurance.

Steam boilers kept exploding until the inspection movement became an insurer — Hartford Steam Boiler, 1866. Electricity was a fire risk until the underwriters funded a laboratory and put their name on it: Underwriters Laboratories. The car became an economy only after motor cover became compulsory. The cloud waited for cyber. Autonomy is the next wave, and today it is uninsurable at scale. That is not a side effect of adoption — it is the throttle on it.

Now — the exclusion era

Incumbents leave. We enter through the hole.

An insurer prices what it cannot measure by leaving, and that is what the ISO endorsements are: a market-wide retreat, filed with regulators, on a renewal schedule. The carve-back sells into the exact shape of that hole — defined by reference to the exclusion itself.

Next — the requirement era

Cover becomes a condition, not a choice.

First contractually — customers write it into MSAs, and we published the clause they use. Then structurally, the way machines among people have always been handled: permits, statutes, certificates. Motor insurance is the largest line on earth because it is required, not because driving is uniquely dangerous. Compulsion converts a market from persuasion to participation.

Then — the layer era

Whoever holds the data prices the risk. For everyone.

Insurance is the only business that is paid to see the losses first. Every policy we bind is a telemetry contract; credibility compounds into pricing power; and the endgame is not selling the most policies — it is being the float and the rating layer the rest of the market prices against.

Performance makes the machine. Insurance is how the world says yes to it.

Four clocks are striking at once: the exclusions attached in 2026, the case law arrived in 2024–25, the humanoid capex cycle is funded, and Japan has already put a class of commercial robots outside its compulsory regime entirely. We did not pick this moment. It picked the category.

The campaignMistakes were machine-made
Mistakes were machine-made
Mistakes were machine-made
Artificial intelligence. Very real invoices.
Artificial intelligence. Very real invoices.
Congratulations. It's a liability.
Congratulations. It's a liability.
Your honor, it was an edge case.
Your honor, it was an edge case.
03 — The losses are not hypothetical

"The model did it" has failed as a defence every time it has been tried.

Benavides v. Tesla · 2025
$243M
$200M of it punitive — on a 33% liability share. The driver was mostly at fault. Tesla still paid. Upheld Feb 2026; on appeal.
Bartz v. Anthropic · 2026
$1.5B
Largest copyright recovery in US history — and the release covers inputs only. Output claims are expressly not released.
Mobley v. Workday
Millions
A nationwide collective. The court refused "we're just a software vendor" and held the vendor in as an agent of its customers.
Moffatt v. Air Canada
C$651
The airline argued its chatbot was a separate entity. The tribunal disagreed. Multiply by everyone who asked the same question.

The gap, in one comparison

The largest dedicated AI limit on the market is about $25M. The largest AI-attributed loss on record is $1.5B. Same risk class, same year.

Largest dedicated AI limit on one product
$25M
Benavides v. Tesla · 33% share
$243M
Knight Capital · 45 minutes
$440M
Delta, attributed to CrowdStrike
$500M
Bartz v. Anthropic · inputs only
$1.5B
04 — What we sell

Two divisions. One household bundle. And a door.

The door · RL-07

Carve-back

We cover what your GL would have covered but for the AI exclusion scheduled on it. Defined by reference, follow-form to the underlying. No wording to negotiate, nothing to educate — the broker already has to deliver the bad news; we hand them the answer.

Rated as a share of the GL premium it restores. Precedent: the standalone terrorism market that formed inside a year of the 2002 exclusions.

Intelligence · RL-01→06

AI without a body

Model liability, agentic operations, IP, interruption, injection, regulatory defence. Priced on what the system is allowed to do without a human — and on how much it can lose before someone notices.

The circuit-breaker delta: 3.7× between a capped and an uncapped agent at a $1m limit. Same company, same revenue. That delta funds the engineering several times over.

Robotics · RL-10→25

Machines that move

Humanoid and fleet liability plus agreed-value machine cover, rated per autonomous hour from telemetry. A supervised humanoid pilot prices at $17,076 per unit-year today — and the rate falls as the fleet proves itself, which is the only incentive that matters.

Roboline Home bundles every embodied machine in a house under one deductible. Today a distribution position; the day the humanoid arrives, a product.

05 — Why we win

We publish the reference. Then we become it.

Insurance lines get big in exactly one way: somebody writes the vocabulary the requirement gets written in. We have already published three.

ARC — the classification: autonomy tiers, operating domains, safety signals, incident severity, the robot-hour. RIC — the requirement: a carrier-neutral clause a buyer puts in an MSA so a vendor's indemnity is backed by someone who can pay. RB — the rating basis: every factor that prices autonomy, labelled measured, borrowed or judgment.

All three are free, CC BY 4.0, and usable against us. That is the point: a standard only one company can satisfy gets struck by counsel. One that anyone can satisfy gets adopted — and whoever wrote it sets the price.

The moat is the data. Every policy we bind carries telemetry. Credibility — in the actuarial sense — is a function of exposure observed, and we will have seen more autonomous hours than anyone by the time the first hard market arrives.

The model, public
Live
Our actuarial model and 30-year simulation run in the browser at /model/. Every assumption editable. A price you cannot interrogate is a quote.
Built before the raise
21 pages
Quote flows in English and Japanese with a real rating ledger, a 110-device consumer catalogue, a vendor self-check, the clause, the standard, the market memo, lead intake. Pre-revenue, and honest about it.
Two markets from day one
US · JP
Japan classified sidewalk robots as pedestrians in 2023 and exempted them from compulsory motor cover. The liability now sits naked on the operator. That is the sale.
The campaignReality is the final eval
It passed every test. Except the stairs.
It passed every test. Except the stairs.
Ctrl+Z doesn't work on furniture.
Ctrl+Z doesn't work on furniture.
The model accounted for everything. Except the cat.
The model accounted for everything. Except the cat.
You can't put autonomy back in the box.
You can't put autonomy back in the box.
06 — The numbers, honestly

The base case is a good business. The bull case is the umbrella of the revolution.

We modelled four worlds and we label them correctly. BASE follows Goldman's humanoid forecast. BULL follows Morgan Stanley's. An investor in this round is underwriting humanoid adoption, and we would rather say so than let you find out.

YearBASE GWPBASE EBITDABULL GWPBULL EBITDA
2028$19.4m−$10.4m$32.1m−$9.4m
2031$77.9m−$13.8m$245.9m−$326,025
2036$590.8m−$28.5m$6.04bn$39.9m
2046$2.43bn$184.1m$48.39bn$5.02bn
2056$3.55bn$270.1m$53.24bn$5.96bn
Year one (plan)
$4.5m
~250 carve-back binds, 40 MSA-driven full schedules, two humanoid pilots. The number that matters is bound accounts with telemetry attached.
Breakeven · peak burn
2035 · $181.2m
In BULL. BASE: 2041 · $235.8m. Both inside what this round plus a Series A funds.
2056, BULL
$36.92bn
Investable float, on $5.96bn of EBITDA. The carrier, not the MGA, is the business — and the model says when to become one: when the loss-ratio path earns it, around 2033.
07 — Use of funds

$10M buys twenty-four months and the right to take paper.

Seed gets us to the milestones a carrier partner and a Series A need to see: bound accounts with telemetry, a first full accident year, two carrier relationships, and the standard cited in contracts we did not write.

Capital & collateral for the fronting and reinsurance programmeWhat a fronting carrier requires before a single policy is issued.
$3.0M
Underwriting, actuarial and claims teamEight hires. The first are a head of underwriting and a head of actuarial.
$3.0M
Telemetry SDK and the rating platformThe moat. What turns a policy into a data relationship.
$2.0M
DistributionWholesale partnerships, the renewal kit, broker operations for the 1 January wave.
$1.0M
Standards, Japan, licensingARC / RIC / RB working groups, the Tokyo entity, surplus-lines eligibility state by state.
$1.0M

Milestones to Series A

12 months

Fronting carrier and quota-share reinsurance in place · first 1/1 renewal wave written · 150+ accounts bound with telemetry · renewal kit live with two wholesale brokers.

18 months

Japan entity writing · first full accident year closing · ARC referenced in at least three third-party MSAs or regulatory comments · humanoid pilot fleets on risk.

24 months

$10M+ GWP run-rate · loss-ratio history that prices the next round · the carrier plan, with a date.

08 — And the brand is already a brand

A category nobody has heard of needs a voice people remember.

Twenty-nine posters, three films, one face. The robot does nothing wrong in any of them. Everything around it does.

The brand film — one line through everything, thirty seconds, the robot holding the frame. The 29-poster wall and the other films are on /vision/.
09 — The ask

$10M to insure the thing everyone is building and nobody has priced.

The autonomy economy will get its insurance layer the way motor got one: somebody writes the standard, somebody writes the requirement, and the premium follows the requirement. We have written both. Fund the book.

Request the data room.

The model, the memos, the simulation, the GTM plan, and the parts of the build that are not on the website. We reply within a business day.

This page is a summary of Roboline, Inc.'s business plan and is provided for information only. It is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities; any such offer will be made only through definitive documents to qualified investors in compliance with applicable securities laws. Financial figures are outputs of a published model whose assumptions are borrowed from adjacent lines or are judgment, as labelled at /model/; they are not forecasts and not commitments. Roboline is pre-revenue; no policies have been bound. Insurance products described are subject to carrier partner approval, regulatory filing, and the terms of the issued policy. Case descriptions are compressed summaries of public reporting; several matters remain under appeal. Legal, regulatory and market facts are as verified in August 2026 and may change.
Roboline, Inc. · San Francisco · Tokyo · The long deck