Humanoids are moving into warehouses and logistics sites faster than anyone has priced them. Specialist robotics cover exists — but humanoid risk still has no standardized rate table. Roboline is building one from robot-hours, interventions, and near-misses.
A chatbot's worst output is words. A humanoid's worst output is force. The moment a model gets actuators, every failure mode gains mass, momentum, and a bystander. General liability, product liability, and commercial auto can each respond to parts of that — but none was drafted for a machine that decides its own next movement, and none of them prices the telemetry that predicts it.
A handoff misjudged, a torque limit exceeded, a person where the map said shelf. Third-party injury is the defining loss of embodied AI — and the first question every deployer's counsel asks.
A 20-kilogram tote through a glass counter, a pallet clipped at speed, a fall onto a customer's car. Small perception errors become large invoices when they carry weight.
A fleet-wide policy update regresses gait or grasping. Yesterday's safe robot is today's incident cluster — and the "defect" was pushed over the air by you.
Shared autonomy blurs the liability line: was the loss the model's plan, the operator's intervention, or the handoff between them? Your policy shouldn't need a trial to decide.
Every deployment defines an operating domain — aisles, hours, weather, proximity rules. Losses that happen outside it are where traditional carriers deny first and litigate second.
A bad firmware push, a revoked model license, a vendor sunset. A hundred robots become a hundred statues — with lease payments and contractual SLAs still running.
Sidewalk delivery robots are the one class of autonomous machine that has already been through a legislature — more than thirty states now have personal-delivery-device laws. The answer, repeatedly, was to treat the machine as a pedestrian and attach an insurance minimum. That minimum is the most useful number in this business, because of how small it is.
Virginia's statute is representative. A personal delivery device on a sidewalk “shall have all the rights and responsibilities applicable to a pedestrian”, may not exceed 10 mph, and its operator must carry “general liability coverage of at least $100,000 for damages arising from the combined operations of personal delivery devices”. Japan reached the same pedestrian analogy in 2023 and drew the opposite conclusion, placing these machines outside compulsory motor insurance entirely.
Read the American limit closely. It is not $100,000 per device, or per incident, or per year. It is $100,000 for the combined operations of the fleet — one number covering every unit an operator runs in that state.
This is what makes delivery robots the most useful precedent in embodied AI. Nobody argued much about whether machines in public space should carry cover — legislature after legislature answered yes, quickly and without controversy, and settled on a placeholder number because nobody had loss data to set a real one. That is the pattern every heavier class of machine will follow: the requirement arrives first, the limit gets serious after the first cluster of claims.
A humanoid on a shop floor is forty times the mass of a delivery robot and works within arm's reach of people. When that class is compelled — and the sidewalk precedent says it will be — the limit will not start at $100,000. We are building the loss data that gets used to set it.
Series RL-10 extends the same policy architecture as our AI lines — clause codes, telemetry underwriting, one claims desk — to machines with mass. Lines marked pilot are binding coverage for design partners today.
Limits: $1M – $25M per occurrence · Priced per robot-hour by ODD class
Limits: agreed value per unit · Fleet aggregates available
Limits: $500K – $10M per event · Requires staged-rollout practices
Limits: $1M – $10M per occurrence · No autonomy-vs-operator coverage dispute: one line pays
Structure: master + certificates · Premium follows deployed hours, not headcount
Limits: $5M – $50M aggregate · Underwritten from your test and field telemetry
Distribution: direct + OEM partnerships · Priced per household, not per device
Liability cover is priced on failure, so a fleet that improves pays less for it every year — as it should. These lines work the other way. A machine that is more reliable holds its value longer, meets its uptime commitments more often, and costs less to keep running. We would rather be paid for that than for your accidents.
Multi-year parts-and-labour cover attached at the point of sale. Because we read force anomalies, duty cycles, and thermal drift, we can flag an actuator or battery before it fails — turning a claim into a scheduled maintenance ticket. Priced as a share of hardware value; administered by us, sold by the OEM.
Lessors will not write humanoid leases without a residual model, and no residual model exists — so fleets get bought instead of leased, or not at all. We guarantee the residual so the lease gets written. Residual value insurance is established in auto, aviation, and equipment finance; only the asset class is new.
The employer's line for a mixed human-and-machine workforce. When a shift moves from people to robots, the risk it carried does not disappear — injury exposure to the remaining human crew, to visitors, and to third parties re-attaches to the machines. RL-25 is written to receive that budget rather than watch it shrink.
Robotics-as-a-service means someone commits to an availability figure and pays penalties for missing it. We reinsure that commitment, measured continuously from the same telemetry that prices the rest of the fleet. Your SLA becomes a covered exposure rather than an uncapped promise.
RL-10 · RL-11 · RL-12 · RL-13 · RL-14 · RL-15
Rate per robot-hour falls as the fleet improvesRL-19 · RL-21 · RL-22 · RL-25
Value rises as the fleet improvesA humanoid logs every joint torque, every plan, every intervention, every near-miss — a black box richer than anything in aviation. Legacy carriers can't read it. Our underwriting engine was built for it.
Signals we underwrite from — read-only, metadata-level, no camera frames leave your system:
Every deployer tells us their robot is safe. Telemetry lets them prove it — and be priced on the proof. Fleets that improve their intervention rate quarter over quarter watch their premium follow it down. That's the market working the way it never could on paper questionnaires.
A humanoid fleet is a monoculture: the same policy weights, the same firmware, the same blind spot — replicated in every unit. Accident math built on independent events breaks here. Ours doesn't, because it was never built on it.
RL-12 terms are materially cheaper for staged rollouts with automatic rollback than for fleet-wide pushes. Deployment discipline isn't a best practice we recommend — it's a rating variable we measure.
Exposure is capped per OEM platform and per foundation-model dependency, so a single regression can't take down insurer and insured together. The cap is disclosed to fleet clients — concentration risk you can see is concentration risk you can plan around.
If a defect grounds your fleet — by regulator order, OEM stop-use, or your own safety call — parametric grounding cover pays per robot-day from the order record itself. Aviation has AOG cover; robotics now does too.
Move the controls for an indicative monthly figure across RL-10 + RL-11. Pilot-program pricing is bespoke and underwritten from your actual telemetry.
Humanoids are the beachhead, not the boundary. The same telemetry engine underwrites anything with actuators and a log — and the next embodied lines are already drafted.
Delivery robots, warehouse AMRs, and drone fleets — priced per mile and per flight-hour, with municipal liability certificates cities actually accept. The kerbside is a jurisdiction; we write for it.
Autonomy kits on legacy machines — forklifts, tractors, excavators — create a liability seam between the machine's maker and the kit's. RL-17 writes across the seam so the farmer isn't the one litigating it.
Cities will permit robots in public space the way they permit scaffolding: show the certificate. RL-18 is that certificate — public liability written for machines among crowds, with the telemetry conditions that keep them welcome.
Every humanoid deployment has an OEM, a deployer, an operator, and a site. Roboline writes each seat — with clause codes that interlock instead of subrogating against each other.
Embed insurance in the sale or lease. A humanoid that arrives pre-insured closes enterprise deals faster than one that arrives with a risk memo.
The COI your customer's risk team actually asks for — humanoid-specific liability with limits that match the site, not a stretched GL policy.
Teleop vendors and supervision teams carry their own defined slice — so a handoff incident has an answer before it has a lawsuit.
When the humanoid comes home, the household bundle is waiting: liability, device protection, and privacy in a single consumer policy.
RL-10 and RL-11 binding for design-partner fleets in industrial and logistics settings. Every pilot feeds the actuarial base: robot-hours, interventions, near-misses, losses. Partners get preferential terms locked through GA.
The full embodied schedule — RL-10 through RL-15 — opens to the market: fleet master policies, per-site certificates, OEM programs, and a humanoid rate card published openly rather than quoted case by case.
The consumer bundle ships with OEM distribution partners: one policy covering the home humanoid and every AI appliance around it — liability, device protection, and household data cover under one premium.


A fleet is not one risk repeated — it is one risk correlated. The same policy weights, the same blind spot, standing in ranks. That is why we rate per robot-hour and cap our own exposure per platform.
Deploying humanoids in the next 18 months? Join the pilot: preferential terms locked through GA, binding cover now, and a seat in defining how humanoid risk gets rated.
Start an application OEM partnerships